Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It's also a perfectly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment on the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that even though the crime of murder was proven, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for contemplating mitigating factors during sentencing.
Deterrence: The concern of severe repercussions, like capital punishment, is meant to deter possible criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is vital in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.
It's now properly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are totally different, therefore, inside our view the acquired Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner through the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed because of the respondent/Institute, these rules might not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework from the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what is discussed higher than, without touching the merits in the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability from the petition is sustained and the petition is held being not maintainable in terms of Article 199 on the Constitution for the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio on the judgment passed via the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
be recognized without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This can be a horrifying reality, a very very low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
whether whilst granting promotion senior employees were viewed as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
Normally, only an appeal accepted with the court of very last resort will resolve this sort of differences and, For a lot of reasons, such appeals tend to be not granted.
I) The above referred case FIR, for your murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that's father from the petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is surely an eyewkness with the event.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, will be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution of the convicted person for a consequence of their crime.
ten. Without touching the merits in the case of your issue of yearly increases within the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees more info of KMC, requires further assessment to be made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to enhancing the effectiveness with the legislation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )